## Summary
- Fixed napi_strict_equals to use JavaScript === operator semantics
instead of Object.is()
- Added missing recv parameter validation in napi_call_function
- Fixed napi_create_array_with_length boundary handling to match Node.js
behavior
## Changes
### napi_strict_equals
- Changed from isSameValue (Object.is semantics) to isStrictEqual (===
semantics)
- Now correctly implements JavaScript strict equality: NaN !== NaN and
-0 === 0
- Added new JSC binding JSC__JSValue__isStrictEqual to support this
### napi_call_function
- Added NAPI_CHECK_ARG(env, recv) validation to match Node.js behavior
- Prevents crashes when recv parameter is null/undefined
### napi_create_array_with_length
- Fixed boundary value handling for negative and oversized lengths
- Now correctly clamps negative signed values to 0 (e.g., when size_t
0x80000000 becomes negative in i32)
- Matches Node.js V8 implementation which casts size_t to int then
clamps to min 0
## Test plan
- [x] Added comprehensive C++ tests in
test/napi/napi-app/standalone_tests.cpp
- [x] Added corresponding JavaScript tests in test/napi/napi.test.ts
- [x] Tests verify:
- Strict equality semantics (NaN, -0/0, normal values)
- Null recv parameter handling
- Array creation with boundary values (negative, oversized, edge cases)
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Replace `catch bun.outOfMemory()`, which can accidentally catch
non-OOM-related errors, with either `bun.handleOom` or a manual `catch
|err| switch (err)`.
(For internal tracking: fixes STAB-1070)
---------
Co-authored-by: Dylan Conway <dylan.conway567@gmail.com>
### What does this PR do?
Defers exceptions thrown by NAPI code until execution returns/flows to
JS code.
### How did you verify your code works?
Ran existing NAPI tests and added to napi.test.ts.
### What does this PR do?
- for these kinds of aborts which we test in CI, introduce a feature
flag to suppress core dumps and crash reporting only from that abort,
and set the flag when running the test:
- libuv stub functions
- Node-API abort (used in particular when calling illegal functions
during finalizers)
- passing `process.kill` its own PID
- core dumps are suppressed with `setrlimit`, and crash reporting with
the new `suppress_reporting` field. these suppressions are only engaged
right before crashing, so we won't ignore new kinds of crashes that come
up in these tests.
- for the test bindings used to test the crash handler in
`run-crash-handler.test.ts`, disables core dumps but does not disable
crash reporting (because crashes get reported to a server that the test
is running to make sure they are reported)
- fixes a panic when printing source code around an error containing
`\n\r`
- updates the code where we clone vendor tests to checkout the right tag
- adds `vendor/elysia/test/path/plugin.test.ts` to
no-validate-exceptions
- this failure was exposed by starting to test the version of elysia we
have been intending to test. the crash trace suggests it may be fixed by
#21307.
- makes dumping core or uploading a crash report count as a failing test
- this ensures we don't realize a crash has occurred if it happened in a
subprocess and the main test doesn't adequately check the exit code. to
spawn a subprocess you expect to fail, prefer `expect(code).toBe(1)`
over `expect(code).not.toBe(0)`. if you really expect multiple possible
erroneous exit codes, you might try `expect(signal).toBeNull()` to still
disallow crashes.
### How did you verify your code works?
Running affected tests on a Linux machine with core dumps set up and
checking no new ones appear.
https://buildkite.com/bun/bun/builds/21465 has no core dumps.
