### What does this PR do?
Matches node behavior.
Fixes#20975
### How did you verify your code works?
Manually and added a test
---------
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
### What does this PR do?
Resume work on https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pull/21898
### How did you verify your code works?
Manually tested on MacOS, Windows 11 and Ubuntu 25.04. CI changes are
needed for the tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Bot <claude-bot@bun.sh>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jarred Sumner <jarred@jarredsumner.com>
### What does this PR do?
### How did you verify your code works?
---------
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
### What does this PR do?
- for these kinds of aborts which we test in CI, introduce a feature
flag to suppress core dumps and crash reporting only from that abort,
and set the flag when running the test:
- libuv stub functions
- Node-API abort (used in particular when calling illegal functions
during finalizers)
- passing `process.kill` its own PID
- core dumps are suppressed with `setrlimit`, and crash reporting with
the new `suppress_reporting` field. these suppressions are only engaged
right before crashing, so we won't ignore new kinds of crashes that come
up in these tests.
- for the test bindings used to test the crash handler in
`run-crash-handler.test.ts`, disables core dumps but does not disable
crash reporting (because crashes get reported to a server that the test
is running to make sure they are reported)
- fixes a panic when printing source code around an error containing
`\n\r`
- updates the code where we clone vendor tests to checkout the right tag
- adds `vendor/elysia/test/path/plugin.test.ts` to
no-validate-exceptions
- this failure was exposed by starting to test the version of elysia we
have been intending to test. the crash trace suggests it may be fixed by
#21307.
- makes dumping core or uploading a crash report count as a failing test
- this ensures we don't realize a crash has occurred if it happened in a
subprocess and the main test doesn't adequately check the exit code. to
spawn a subprocess you expect to fail, prefer `expect(code).toBe(1)`
over `expect(code).not.toBe(0)`. if you really expect multiple possible
erroneous exit codes, you might try `expect(signal).toBeNull()` to still
disallow crashes.
### How did you verify your code works?
Running affected tests on a Linux machine with core dumps set up and
checking no new ones appear.
https://buildkite.com/bun/bun/builds/21465 has no core dumps.
## Summary
Fixes the "index out of bounds: index 0, len 0" crash that occurs during
large batch PostgreSQL inserts, particularly on Windows systems.
The issue occurred when PostgreSQL DataRow messages contained data but
the `statement.fields` array was empty (len=0), causing crashes in
`DataCell.Putter.putImpl()`. This typically happens during large batch
operations where there may be race conditions or timing issues between
RowDescription and DataRow message processing.
## Changes
- **Add bounds checking** in `DataCell.Putter.putImpl()` before
accessing `fields` and `list` arrays
(src/sql/postgres/DataCell.zig:1043-1050)
- **Graceful degradation** - return `false` to ignore extra fields
instead of crashing
- **Debug logging** to help diagnose field metadata issues
- **Comprehensive regression tests** covering batch inserts, empty
results, and concurrent operations
## Test Plan
- [x] Added regression tests in `test/regression/issue/21311.test.ts`
- [x] Tests pass with the fix: All 3 tests pass with 212 expect() calls
- [x] Existing PostgreSQL tests still work (no regressions)
The fix prevents the crash while maintaining safe operation, allowing
PostgreSQL batch operations to continue working reliably.
## Root Cause
The crash occurred when:
1. `statement.fields` array was empty (len=0) due to timing issues
2. PostgreSQL DataRow messages contained actual data
3. Code tried to access `this.list[index]` and `this.fields[index]`
without bounds checking
This was particularly problematic on Windows during batch operations due
to potential differences in:
- Network stack message ordering
- Memory allocation behavior
- Threading/concurrency during batch operations
- Statement preparation timing
Fixes#21311🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Bot <claude-bot@bun.sh>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ciro Spaciari <ciro.spaciari@gmail.com>
