### What does this PR do?
Fixes#22014
todo:
- [x] not spawn sync
- [x] better comm to subprocess (not stderr)
- [x] tty
- [x] more tests (also include some tests for the actual implementation
of a provider)
- [x] disable autoinstall?
Scanner template: https://github.com/oven-sh/security-scanner-template
<!-- **Please explain what your changes do**, example: -->
<!--
This adds a new flag --bail to bun test. When set, it will stop running
tests after the first failure. This is useful for CI environments where
you want to fail fast.
-->
---
- [x] Documentation or TypeScript types (it's okay to leave the rest
blank in this case)
- [x] Code changes
### How did you verify your code works?
<!-- **For code changes, please include automated tests**. Feel free to
uncomment the line below -->
<!-- I wrote automated tests -->
<!-- If JavaScript/TypeScript modules or builtins changed:
- [ ] I included a test for the new code, or existing tests cover it
- [ ] I ran my tests locally and they pass (`bun-debug test
test-file-name.test`)
-->
<!-- If Zig files changed:
- [ ] I checked the lifetime of memory allocated to verify it's (1)
freed and (2) only freed when it should be
- [ ] I included a test for the new code, or an existing test covers it
- [ ] JSValue used outside of the stack is either wrapped in a
JSC.Strong or is JSValueProtect'ed
- [ ] I wrote TypeScript/JavaScript tests and they pass locally
(`bun-debug test test-file-name.test`)
-->
<!-- If new methods, getters, or setters were added to a publicly
exposed class:
- [ ] I added TypeScript types for the new methods, getters, or setters
-->
<!-- If dependencies in tests changed:
- [ ] I made sure that specific versions of dependencies are used
instead of ranged or tagged versions
-->
<!-- If a new builtin ESM/CJS module was added:
- [ ] I updated Aliases in `module_loader.zig` to include the new module
- [ ] I added a test that imports the module
- [ ] I added a test that require() the module
-->
tests (bad currently)
---------
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dylan Conway <dylan-conway@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dylan Conway <dylan.conway567@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jarred Sumner <jarred@jarredsumner.com>
### What does this PR do?
Setting the background color on plaintext diffs makes the plaintext
harder to read. This is particularly true when the input is longer.
This conservatively makes us only add the background color to the diff
when the characters being highlighted are all whitespaces, punctuation
or non-printable.
This branch:
<img width="748" height="388" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ceaf02ba-bf71-4207-a319-c041c8a887de"
/>
Canary:
<img width="742" height="404" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cc380f45-5540-48ed-aea1-07f4b0ab291e"
/>
### How did you verify your code works?
Updated test
Fixes#7569
This adds expectTypeOf, but not the experimental `--typecheck` flag from
vitest. To use it, you need to typecheck manually with `bunx tsc
--noEmit` in addition to `bun test`
---------
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Before:
```
failing-test-passes.fixture.ts:
^ this test is marked as failing but it passed. Remove \`.failing\` if tested behavior now works
(fail) This should fail but it doesnt [0.24ms]
^ this test is marked as failing but it passed. Remove \`.failing\` if tested behavior now works
(fail) This should fail but it doesnt (async) [0.23ms]
```
After:
```
failing-test-passes.fixture.ts:
(fail) This should fail but it doesnt [0.24ms]
^ this test is marked as failing but it passed. Remove \`.failing\` if tested behavior now works
(fail) This should fail but it doesnt (async) [0.23ms]
^ this test is marked as failing but it passed. Remove \`.failing\` if tested behavior now works
```
Adds a snapshot test
---------
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes#12276: toIncludeRepeated should check for the exact repeat count
not >=
This is a breaking change because some people may be relying on the
existing behaviour. Should it be feature-flagged for 1.3?
---------
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
### What does this PR do?
- for these kinds of aborts which we test in CI, introduce a feature
flag to suppress core dumps and crash reporting only from that abort,
and set the flag when running the test:
- libuv stub functions
- Node-API abort (used in particular when calling illegal functions
during finalizers)
- passing `process.kill` its own PID
- core dumps are suppressed with `setrlimit`, and crash reporting with
the new `suppress_reporting` field. these suppressions are only engaged
right before crashing, so we won't ignore new kinds of crashes that come
up in these tests.
- for the test bindings used to test the crash handler in
`run-crash-handler.test.ts`, disables core dumps but does not disable
crash reporting (because crashes get reported to a server that the test
is running to make sure they are reported)
- fixes a panic when printing source code around an error containing
`\n\r`
- updates the code where we clone vendor tests to checkout the right tag
- adds `vendor/elysia/test/path/plugin.test.ts` to
no-validate-exceptions
- this failure was exposed by starting to test the version of elysia we
have been intending to test. the crash trace suggests it may be fixed by
#21307.
- makes dumping core or uploading a crash report count as a failing test
- this ensures we don't realize a crash has occurred if it happened in a
subprocess and the main test doesn't adequately check the exit code. to
spawn a subprocess you expect to fail, prefer `expect(code).toBe(1)`
over `expect(code).not.toBe(0)`. if you really expect multiple possible
erroneous exit codes, you might try `expect(signal).toBeNull()` to still
disallow crashes.
### How did you verify your code works?
Running affected tests on a Linux machine with core dumps set up and
checking no new ones appear.
https://buildkite.com/bun/bun/builds/21465 has no core dumps.
