### What does this PR do?
This PR fixes https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/19131.
I am not 100% certain that this fix is correct as I am still nebulous
regarding some decisions I've made in this PR. I'll try to provide my
reasoning and would love to be proven wrong:
#### Re-authentication
- The `is_authenticated` flag needs to be reset to false. When the
lifecycle reaches a point of attempting to connect, it sends out a
`HELLO 3`, and receives a response. `handleResponse()` is fired and does
not correctly handle it because there is a guard at the top of the
function:
```zig
if (!this.flags.is_authenticated) {
this.handleHelloResponse(value);
// We've handled the HELLO response without consuming anything from the command queue
return;
}
```
Rather, it treats this packet as a regular data packet and complains
that it doesn't have a promise to associate it to. By resetting the
`is_authenticated` flag to false, we guarantee that we handle the `HELLO
3` packet as an authentication packet.
It also seems to make semantic sense since dropping a connection implies
you dropped authentication.
#### Retry Attempts
I've deleted the `retry_attempts = 0` in `reconnect()` because I noticed
that we would never actually re-attempt to reconnect after the first
attempt. Specifically, I was expecting `valkey.zig:459` to potentially
fire multiple times, but it only ever fired once. Removing this reset to
zero caused successful reattempts (in my case 3 of them).
```zig
debug("reconnect in {d}ms (attempt {d}/{d})", .{ delay_ms, this.retry_attempts, this.max_retries });
```
I'm still iffy on whether this is necessary, but I think it makes sense.
```zig
this.client.retry_attempts = 0
```
### How did you verify your code works?
I have added a small unit test. I have compared mainline `bun`, which
fails that test, to this fix, which passes the test.
---------
Co-authored-by: Ciro Spaciari <ciro.spaciari@gmail.com>
