### What does this PR do?
The goal of this PR is to introduce PUB/SUB functionality to the
built-in Redis client. Based on the fact that the current Redis API does
not appear to have compatibility with `io-redis` or `redis-node`, I've
decided to do away with existing APIs and API compatibility with these
existing libraries.
I have decided to base my implementation on the [`redis-node` pub/sub
API](https://github.com/redis/node-redis/blob/master/docs/pub-sub.md).
### How did you verify your code works?
I've written a set of unit tests to hopefully catch the major use-cases
of this feature. They all appear to pass:
<img width="368" height="71" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/36527386-c8fe-47f6-b69a-a11d4b614fa0"
/>
#### Future Improvements
I would have a lot more confidence in our Redis implementation if we
tested it with a test suite running over a network which emulates a high
network failure rate. There are large amounts of edge cases that are
worthwhile to grab, but I think we can roll that out in a future PR.
### Future Tasks
- [ ] Tests over flaky network
- [ ] Use the custom private members over `_<member>`.
---------
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dylan Conway <dylan.conway567@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alistair Smith <hi@alistair.sh>
### What does this PR do?
Enable connecting to different databases for Redis.
### How did you verify your code works?
Unit tests were added.
### Credits
Thank you very much @HeyItsBATMAN for your original PR. I've made
extremely slight changes to your PR. I apologize for it taking so long
to review and merge your PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kai Niebes <kai.niebes@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
### What does this PR do?
This PR fixes https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/19131.
I am not 100% certain that this fix is correct as I am still nebulous
regarding some decisions I've made in this PR. I'll try to provide my
reasoning and would love to be proven wrong:
#### Re-authentication
- The `is_authenticated` flag needs to be reset to false. When the
lifecycle reaches a point of attempting to connect, it sends out a
`HELLO 3`, and receives a response. `handleResponse()` is fired and does
not correctly handle it because there is a guard at the top of the
function:
```zig
if (!this.flags.is_authenticated) {
this.handleHelloResponse(value);
// We've handled the HELLO response without consuming anything from the command queue
return;
}
```
Rather, it treats this packet as a regular data packet and complains
that it doesn't have a promise to associate it to. By resetting the
`is_authenticated` flag to false, we guarantee that we handle the `HELLO
3` packet as an authentication packet.
It also seems to make semantic sense since dropping a connection implies
you dropped authentication.
#### Retry Attempts
I've deleted the `retry_attempts = 0` in `reconnect()` because I noticed
that we would never actually re-attempt to reconnect after the first
attempt. Specifically, I was expecting `valkey.zig:459` to potentially
fire multiple times, but it only ever fired once. Removing this reset to
zero caused successful reattempts (in my case 3 of them).
```zig
debug("reconnect in {d}ms (attempt {d}/{d})", .{ delay_ms, this.retry_attempts, this.max_retries });
```
I'm still iffy on whether this is necessary, but I think it makes sense.
```zig
this.client.retry_attempts = 0
```
### How did you verify your code works?
I have added a small unit test. I have compared mainline `bun`, which
fails that test, to this fix, which passes the test.
---------
Co-authored-by: Ciro Spaciari <ciro.spaciari@gmail.com>
### What does this PR do?
Fix#21905
### How did you verify your code works?
---------
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
