Fixes#7569
This adds expectTypeOf, but not the experimental `--typecheck` flag from
vitest. To use it, you need to typecheck manually with `bunx tsc
--noEmit` in addition to `bun test`
---------
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Before:
```
failing-test-passes.fixture.ts:
^ this test is marked as failing but it passed. Remove \`.failing\` if tested behavior now works
(fail) This should fail but it doesnt [0.24ms]
^ this test is marked as failing but it passed. Remove \`.failing\` if tested behavior now works
(fail) This should fail but it doesnt (async) [0.23ms]
```
After:
```
failing-test-passes.fixture.ts:
(fail) This should fail but it doesnt [0.24ms]
^ this test is marked as failing but it passed. Remove \`.failing\` if tested behavior now works
(fail) This should fail but it doesnt (async) [0.23ms]
^ this test is marked as failing but it passed. Remove \`.failing\` if tested behavior now works
```
Adds a snapshot test
---------
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
### What does this PR do?
We had `bun.strings.assertIsValidWindowsPath(...)` in the resolver, but
we can't do this because the path may come from the user. Instead, let
our error handling code handle it.
Also fixes#21065
---------
Co-authored-by: Jarred Sumner <jarred@jarredsumner.com>
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/19198
This implements RFC 9110 Section 13.1.2 If-None-Match conditional
request support for static routes in Bun.serve().
**Key Features:**
- Automatic ETag generation for static content based on content hash
- If-None-Match header evaluation with weak entity tag comparison
- 304 Not Modified responses for cache efficiency
- Standards-compliant handling of wildcards (*), multiple ETags, and
weak ETags (W/)
- Method-specific application (GET/HEAD only) with proper 405 responses
for other methods
## Implementation Details
- ETags are generated using `bun.hash()` and formatted as strong ETags
(e.g., "abc123")
- Preserves existing ETag headers from Response objects
- Uses weak comparison semantics as defined in RFC 9110 Section 8.8.3.2
- Handles comma-separated ETag lists and malformed headers gracefully
- Only applies to GET/HEAD requests with 200 status codes
## Files Changed
- `src/bun.js/api/server/StaticRoute.zig` - Core implementation (~100
lines)
- `test/js/bun/http/serve-if-none-match.test.ts` - Comprehensive test
suite (17 tests)
## Test Results
- ✅ All 17 new If-None-Match tests pass
- ✅ All 34 existing static route tests pass (no regressions)
- ✅ Debug build compiles successfully
## Test plan
- [ ] Run existing HTTP server tests to ensure no regressions
- [ ] Test ETag generation for various content types
- [ ] Verify 304 responses reduce bandwidth in real scenarios
- [ ] Test edge cases like malformed If-None-Match headers
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Bot <claude-bot@bun.sh>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes#12276: toIncludeRepeated should check for the exact repeat count
not >=
This is a breaking change because some people may be relying on the
existing behaviour. Should it be feature-flagged for 1.3?
---------
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
### What does this PR do?
- for these kinds of aborts which we test in CI, introduce a feature
flag to suppress core dumps and crash reporting only from that abort,
and set the flag when running the test:
- libuv stub functions
- Node-API abort (used in particular when calling illegal functions
during finalizers)
- passing `process.kill` its own PID
- core dumps are suppressed with `setrlimit`, and crash reporting with
the new `suppress_reporting` field. these suppressions are only engaged
right before crashing, so we won't ignore new kinds of crashes that come
up in these tests.
- for the test bindings used to test the crash handler in
`run-crash-handler.test.ts`, disables core dumps but does not disable
crash reporting (because crashes get reported to a server that the test
is running to make sure they are reported)
- fixes a panic when printing source code around an error containing
`\n\r`
- updates the code where we clone vendor tests to checkout the right tag
- adds `vendor/elysia/test/path/plugin.test.ts` to
no-validate-exceptions
- this failure was exposed by starting to test the version of elysia we
have been intending to test. the crash trace suggests it may be fixed by
#21307.
- makes dumping core or uploading a crash report count as a failing test
- this ensures we don't realize a crash has occurred if it happened in a
subprocess and the main test doesn't adequately check the exit code. to
spawn a subprocess you expect to fail, prefer `expect(code).toBe(1)`
over `expect(code).not.toBe(0)`. if you really expect multiple possible
erroneous exit codes, you might try `expect(signal).toBeNull()` to still
disallow crashes.
### How did you verify your code works?
Running affected tests on a Linux machine with core dumps set up and
checking no new ones appear.
https://buildkite.com/bun/bun/builds/21465 has no core dumps.
I haven't checked all uses of tryTakeException but this bug is probably
not the only one.
Caught by running fuzzy-wuzzy with debug logging enabled. It tried to
print the exception. Updates fuzzy-wuzzy to have improved logging that
can tell you what was last executed before a crash.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jarred Sumner <jarred@jarredsumner.com>
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
We cannot assume that the next event loop cycle will yield the expected outcome from the operating system. We can assume certain things happen in a certain order, but when timers run next does not mean kqueue/epoll/iocp will always have the data available there.
We cannot assume that the next event loop cycle will yield the expected outcome from the operating system. We can assume certain things happen in a certain order, but when timers run next does not mean kqueue/epoll/iocp will always have the data available there.