f718f4a312
## Summary
Fixes an issue where `--compile-exec-argv` options were incorrectly
appearing in `process.argv` when no user arguments were provided to a
compiled standalone binary.
## Problem
When building a standalone binary with `--compile-exec-argv`, the exec
argv options would leak into `process.argv` when running the binary
without any user arguments:
```bash
# Build with exec argv
bun build --compile-exec-argv="--user-agent=hello" --compile ./a.js
# Run without arguments - BEFORE fix
./a
# Output showed --user-agent=hello in both execArgv AND argv (incorrect)
{
execArgv: [ "--user-agent=hello" ],
argv: [ "bun", "/$bunfs/root/a", "--user-agent=hello" ], # <- BUG: exec argv leaked here
}
# Expected behavior (matches runtime):
bun --user-agent=hello a.js
{
execArgv: [ "--user-agent=hello" ],
argv: [ "/path/to/bun", "/path/to/a.js" ], # <- No exec argv in process.argv
}
```
## Solution
The issue was in the offset calculation for determining which arguments
to pass through to the JavaScript runtime. The offset was being
calculated before modifying the argv array with exec argv options,
causing it to be incorrect when the original argv only contained the
executable name.
The fix ensures that:
- `process.execArgv` correctly contains the compile-exec-argv options
- `process.argv` only contains the executable, script path, and user
arguments
- exec argv options never leak into `process.argv`
## Test plan
Added comprehensive tests to verify:
1. Exec argv options don't leak into process.argv when no user arguments
are provided
2. User arguments are properly passed through when exec argv is present
3. Existing behavior continues to work correctly
All tests pass:
```
bun test compile-argv.test.ts
✓ 3 tests pass
```
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Tests
Finding tests
Tests are located in the test/ directory and are organized using the following structure:
test/js/- tests for JavaScript APIs.cli/- tests for commands, configs, and stdout.bundler/- tests for the transpiler/bundler.regression/- tests that reproduce a specific issue.harness.ts- utility functions that can be imported from any test.
The tests in test/js/ directory are further categorized by the type of API.
test/js/bun/- tests forBun-specific APIs.node/- tests for Node.js APIs.web/- tests for Web APIs, likefetch().first_party/- tests for npm packages that are built-in, likeundici.third_party/- tests for npm packages that are not built-in, but are popular, likeesbuild.
Running tests
To run a test, use Bun's built-in test command: bun test.
bun test # Run all tests
bun test js/bun # Only run tests in a directory
bun test sqlite.test.ts # Only run a specific test
If you encounter lots of errors, try running bun install, then trying again.
Writing tests
Tests are written in TypeScript (preferred) or JavaScript using Jest's describe(), test(), and expect() APIs.
import { describe, test, expect } from "bun:test";
import { gcTick } from "harness";
describe("TextEncoder", () => {
test("can encode a string", async () => {
const encoder = new TextEncoder();
const actual = encoder.encode("bun");
await gcTick();
expect(actual).toBe(new Uint8Array([0x62, 0x75, 0x6E]));
});
});
If you are fixing a bug that was reported from a GitHub issue, remember to add a test in the test/regression/ directory.
// test/regression/issue/02005.test.ts
import { it, expect } from "bun:test";
it("regex literal should work with non-latin1", () => {
const text = "这是一段要替换的文字";
expect(text.replace(new RegExp("要替换"), "")).toBe("这是一段的文字");
expect(text.replace(/要替换/, "")).toBe("这是一段的文字");
});
In the future, a bot will automatically close or re-open issues when a regression is detected or resolved.
Zig tests
These tests live in various .zig files throughout Bun's codebase, leveraging Zig's builtin test keyword.
Currently, they're not run automatically nor is there a simple way to run all of them. We will make this better soon.
TypeScript
Test files should be written in TypeScript. The types in packages/bun-types should be updated to support all new APIs. Changes to the .d.ts files in packages/bun-types will be immediately reflected in test files; no build step is necessary.
Writing a test will often require using invalid syntax, e.g. when checking for errors when an invalid input is passed to a function. TypeScript provides a number of escape hatches here.
// @ts-expect-error- This should be your first choice. It tells TypeScript that the next line should fail typechecking.// @ts-ignore- Ignore the next line entirely.// @ts-nocheck- Put this at the top of the file to disable typechecking on the entire file. Useful for autogenerated test files, or when ignoring/disabling type checks an a per-line basis is too onerous.